| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HVGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120418 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 25 '22 at 17:00 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.9%
Above average
|
63% 108 Pts
|
35% 274 Pts
|
19% 312 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.2%
Poor
|
29% 39.8 fps
|
27% 33.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU655 240GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180509a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 22 38 21 16 15 MB/s
|
43.7%
Average
|
26% 120 MB/s
|
88% 29.5 MB/s
|
72% 110 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
59GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 107 82 97 100 92 MB/s
|
51.6%
Above average
|
60% 81.5 MB/s
|
119% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ramaxel RM51264BA1339.16FR 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
41.1%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
46% 87.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-HVGS Builds (Compare 136 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 18x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 13x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 12x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |