Foxconn Inferno Katana

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemFoxconn Inferno Katana  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN Inferno Katana
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100511
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 15:11
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 96.3
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 170
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 424
46% 367 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 3663) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 178
Parallax 174
123% 168 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 140
Splatting 122
119% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 103 116 117 117 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.8% Above average
Read 253
Write 240
Mixed 197
SusWrite 110
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 27.6
86% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 184
143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 108%
As25 480GB 480GB
248GB free
Firmware: R0817A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 104 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.8% Average
Read 255
Write 238
Mixed 237
SusWrite 110
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 0.7
75% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 62.1
DQ Mixed 52
59% 104 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 105%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$35
227GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 170 198 201 201 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 653
Write 594
Mixed 623
SusWrite 184
115% 514 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 54.4
176% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 619
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 541
408% 548 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 117%
Great: 297%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
191GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 103 111 113 112 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 133
Write 131
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 107
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
436GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 100 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 117
Write 115
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 98
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inferno Katana Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Foxconn Inferno Katana

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $235
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback