MSI B360M MORTAR TITANIUM (MS-7B23)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B23
MotherboardMSI B360M MORTAR TITANIUM (MS-7B23)  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201012
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 13:23
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 513
65% 491 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
Asus(1043 8889) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Lighting 109
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 93
89% 95.6 fps
MRender 85.3
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 67.2
61% 75.7 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
120gb SSD 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0127C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 176 177 189 191 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 429
Write 168
Mixed 190
SusWrite 153
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 8.7
58% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 88.3
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 13
34% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 80%
CT250MX500SSD4N 250GB
34GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 400 410 353 181 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 405
Write 391
Mixed 352
SusWrite 312
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 37.6
123% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 272
227% 329 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 23.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 23.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M MORTAR TITANIUM (MS-7B23) Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI B360M MORTAR TITANIUM (MS-7B23)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback