Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 134% UFO	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 134% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220727
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '22 at 13:16
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 192 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 687 64% 533 Pts	64-Core 1,174 73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% MSI(1462 3896) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4900 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	179% Outstanding	Lighting 254 Reflection 236 Parallax 270 207% 253 fps	MRender 302 Gravity 224 Splatting 165 181% 230 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 644GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1631 1711 1505 1164 1185 1187 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	289% Outstanding	Read 2,376 Write 2,149 Mixed 1,502 SusWrite 1,397 416% 1,856 MB/s	4K Read 55.3 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 71.7 236% 80 MB/s	DQ Read 890 DQ Write 703 DQ Mixed 762 580% 785 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 289% Great: 372%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 402GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 386 416 414 419 422 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 394 Write 433 Mixed 314 SusWrite 411 88% 388 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 76.2 4K Mixed 36.7 126% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 178 158% 230 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 107%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 25GB free Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 108 121 153 143 165 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.5% Good	Read 252 Write 211 Mixed 233 SusWrite 138 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 67.8 4K Mixed 32.6 111% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 149 123% 174 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 84%
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB 567 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 288 308 306 309 311 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 268 Write 322 Mixed 268 SusWrite 304 66% 291 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 20.4 65% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 82.9 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 128 95% 123 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 100%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 944GB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 124 125 125 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 100 Write 116 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 125 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 68%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 529GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 108 107 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 106 Write 106 Mixed 106 SusWrite 107 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 76%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 427GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 98 101 98 98 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 95.2 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 99 67% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 72%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$46 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 550GB free Firmware: JP4OA3JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 115 115 120 117 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 97 Write 114 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 117 71% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 76%
ASMT 2115 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 909GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 207 218 217 219 220 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 240 Write 226 Mixed 224 SusWrite 216 308% 227 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 20.8 1,590% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 34.1 DQ Mixed 26.4 2,140% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 217%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110 34,441 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 42.6 MC Write 37.6 MC Mixed 38 113% 39.4 GB/s	SC Read 25 SC Write 36.3 SC Mixed 30.7 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	24x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,059

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)