PC NH5x_7xDPx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC NH5x_7xDPx  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo NHxxDPx
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 22:02
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 922
85% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50F3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 112
Parallax 118
110% 122 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 91.4
Splatting 76.3
81% 103 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 256GB PCS PCIe M 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,634
Write 1136
Mixed 950
274% 1,240 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 28
159% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 192
215% 383 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 164%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
425GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 238 143 141 143 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 483
Mixed 433
SusWrite 214
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 50
165% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666C18S2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 20.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 17.6
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH5x_7xDPx Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

System: PC NH5x_7xDPx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback