HP 860-180st

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP 860-180st  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161206
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateNov 12 '17 at 00:30
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 225
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 694
68% 557 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
HP(103C 2B4D) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.46
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 37
36% 41.2 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 33.8
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GB
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 394
Write 358
Mixed 352
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 23.3
96% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 62.8
105% 205 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 180
Mixed 164
129% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.19
84% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
10GB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 91.9
Write 145
Mixed 102
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.43
4K Write 7.11
4K Mixed 0.7
269% 3.08 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 87%
WD Elements 2TB
157GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 2.68
Write 31.9
Mixed 33.5
36% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.17
62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
7GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 9.88
Mixed 11.4
18% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.73
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.42
55% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD1 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1315 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD1 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
71.8% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 860-180st Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: HP 860-180st

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback