MSI Z97M GAMING (MS-7919)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7919
MotherboardMSI Z97M GAMING (MS-7919)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 00:59
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 278
29% 233 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
ASRock(1849 5210) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 133
Parallax 270
112% 180 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 148
Splatting 201
160% 195 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD_BLACK SN750 S 1TB
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 511 518 556 568 646 645 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 597
Write 650
Mixed 617
SusWrite 574
138% 610 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 27.9
122% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 593
DQ Mixed 725
512% 647 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 316%
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
112GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 206 217 222 254 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 363
Write 298
Mixed 339
SusWrite 227
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 39.6
132% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 251
215% 318 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85%
Great: 122%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
26GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 170 178 160 141 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 352
Write 212
Mixed 294
SusWrite 156
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 31.7
110% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 209
158% 213 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
134GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 164 168 168 174 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 89.1
Write 61.5
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 166
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
88GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 67 61 87 73 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M GAMING (MS-7919) Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97M GAMING (MS-7919) - $667

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback