Lenovo 30AH0016FR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30AH0016FR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory13.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 23 '22 at 18:25
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3-$256
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 188
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 312
46% 335 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 392.68
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 22
24% 27.7 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 23.2
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 216 209 206 204 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 439
Write 262
Mixed 233
SusWrite 215
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 33.7
119% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 168
156% 238 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 20 4.5 36 178 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 176
Write 153
Mixed 102
SusWrite 87.5
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
133% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 168 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 149
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 170
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030KD68F9F1600 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30AH0016FR Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 30AH0016FR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback