Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 220%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 197%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics286% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '22 at 15:54
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 650
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,800
Nvidia(10DE 167C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
286% Outstanding
Lighting 384
Reflection 537
Parallax 769
313% 564 fps
MRender 537
Gravity 576
Splatting 298
368% 470 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 286%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 480GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 176 294 197 225 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.5% Average
Read 279
Write 104
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 251
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 11.3
51% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$33
18GB free
Firmware: ES13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 70 65 64 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 72.1
Write 60.2
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 64.7
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$33
116GB free
Firmware: ES13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 73 65 74 70 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49% Average
Read 101
Write 68.7
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 69.8
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 41.3
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 22
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 31.5" 2560 1440 SAM0E14 C32HG7x
Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback