Asus G751JT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G751JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G751JT
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '15 at 05:58
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 524
55% 441 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Asus(1043 22DA) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 43.1
Parallax 38.1
37% 42.3 fps
MRender 44
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 37.9
33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 485
Write 464
Mixed 449
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 21.4
108% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 14.6
72% 156 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX16GX3M2B1600C9 Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 0215 CMSX16GX3M2B1600C9 Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 18.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G751JT Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus G751JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback