Intel NUC11TNBi5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) NUC11TNHi5
MotherboardIntel NUC11TNBi5  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '22 at 18:56
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 257
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 597
66% 518 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.9% Good
Lighting 91.5
Reflection 87.6
Parallax 78.1
75% 85.7 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 70.1
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO LPX 2TB
998GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1670 1962 2122 2210 1746 1903 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,194
Write 2,024
Mixed 1,976
SusWrite 1,936
458% 2,032 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 78.6
251% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 650
460% 597 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 310%
Great: 602%
Inateck FE202x Series 2TB
190GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 849 833 848 845 847 854 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3200 C22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 28.4
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 18.6
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC11TNBi5 Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC11TNBi5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback