Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dynabook DBIIP301
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '22 at 13:05
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1005G1 22,960 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Memory 20.5 1-Core 68.5 2-Core 111 35% 66.7 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 195 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(3100 0002) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8336 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	4.88% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 5.7 5% 4.9 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 7.5 5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.88% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.2.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 324 266 132 137 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 309 Write 292 Mixed 290 SusWrite 215 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 13.7 48% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 172 122% 151 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 151%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GB 6,335 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 4.9 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 4.1 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 317 13% 317 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	8x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	8x

SSD
256GB SSD 256GBForeseeBench 79%, 1,745 samples	8x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GBMicronBench 39%, 6,335 samples	5x
RB32D4S2S1ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 50 samples	3x