Lenovo 80WR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80WR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '22 at 12:32
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 91
46% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 152
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 4.9
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L2 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 243 217 193 195 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 433
Write 425
Mixed 304
SusWrite 221
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 37.4
121% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 324
244% 328 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown B0-CRC Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 19.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WR Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback