Lenovo 10B6000AUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10B6000AUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '22 at 04:39
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 184
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 293
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 34
Parallax 32.1
26% 32.8 fps
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 23
24% 28.2 fps
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 363 369 356 376 356 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 365
Write 357
Mixed 281
SusWrite 357
77% 340 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 27.5
100% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 251
210% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
212GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 12,943
Mixed 31.6
4,636% 6,487 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10B6000AUS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10B6000AUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback