Huananzhi Gaming TF

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	Huananzhi Gaming TF (all builds)
Motherboard	Huananzhi X99-TF Gaming
Memory	19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211124
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '22 at 23:34
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 1,038 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 87.6 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 152 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 133 20% 144 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Device(1B4C 153C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	130% Outstanding	Lighting 182 Reflection 179 Parallax 168 149% 176 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 136 Splatting 117 116% 145 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HS-SSD-E2000 256GB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 161% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 243 245 222 208 220 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Read 804 Write 459 Mixed 273 SusWrite 232 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 32.8 111% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 234 195% 285 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 197%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 510GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 132GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 584 405 280 346 389 319 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70BH1-CH9 4x8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	82.6% Excellent	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 35.2 MC Mixed 31.8 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 16.9 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Gaming TF Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Huananzhi Gaming TF

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	8x
Xeon E5-2696 v3IntelBench 72%, 1,038 samples	4x
Core i7-5960XIntel $400Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	1x

GPU
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	2x

SSD
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	3x
HS-SSD-E2000 256GBBench 161%, 214 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x

RAM
36ASF4G72PZ-2G6J1 2x31.5GBMicronBench 55%, 6 samples	2x
M393B1K70BH1-CH9 4x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 36 samples	2x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 30% - Below average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359