HP ProDesk 600 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82B4
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '22 at 15:04
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 12
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 178
40% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 287
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82B4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 6.5
5% 5.57 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.3
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 295 330 332 331 339 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 268
Write 258
Mixed 228
SusWrite 322
61% 269 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 17.2
63% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 222
180% 255 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-4 Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 3.5
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 386
10% 386 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback