Originpc EVO15-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemOriginpc EVO15-S  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard GM5AG7Y
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '22 at 14:36
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 186
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 451
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 58%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D05 1175) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1109
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 16.1
12% 16 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 13.9
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 659 624 596 812 852 906 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 603
Write 525
Mixed 623
SusWrite 742
141% 623 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 41.6
121% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 235
171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 118%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM5S16G1M4800A40S2 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 24.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 18.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EVO15-S Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Originpc EVO15-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback