Asus X75VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAsus X75VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75VC
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130605
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '22 at 14:35
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 121
58% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 176
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
745GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 375 379 394 416 418 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 316
Write 369
Mixed 329
SusWrite 388
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 31.8
100% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 159
140% 211 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 859B CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75VC Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback