| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock B250M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170505 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 11 '17 at 13:20 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
57.4%
Above average
|
61% 105 Pts
|
34% 262 Pts
|
20% 318 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
|
57.8%
Above average
|
58% 69.3 fps
|
57% 69.8 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
38.9%
Below average
|
37% 13.1 GB/s
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
40% 98.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B250M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,485 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B250M Pro4 - $85
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 281x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 232x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 176x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 176x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 172x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 146x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $390 |