Acer Aspire E1-732G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-732G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA70_HW
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 21 '22 at 09:24
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 3550M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 52.8
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 68.2
35% 54 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 102
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 99.8
6% 99.8 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0821) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.1
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 128GB-$88
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN059
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 130 151 148 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 331
Write 160
Mixed 181
SusWrite 146
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 23.8
79% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 102
103% 168 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-732G Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-732G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 6% - Terrible Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback