Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '22 at 07:39
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 192
78% 131 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 358
44% 336 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Acer(1025 1332) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.8% Poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 29.5
22% 32.1 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 21.7
20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 28%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 29 36 44 51 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 677
Write 397
Mixed 572
SusWrite 67
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 33.8
120% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 502
DQ Mixed 500
393% 546 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 859B CT8G4SFS8266.C8FN 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 23.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback