MSI H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82)

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	MSI MS-7A82
Motherboard	MSI H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82) (all builds)
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161226
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '22 at 20:20
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 101 2-Core 203 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 298 36% 279 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.3 1% 1.1 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 1.8 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 176 133 117 102 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 432 Write 263 Mixed 256 SusWrite 143 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 32.4 119% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 186 176% 276 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 128%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 2TB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	26% Poor	Read 50.6 Write 38.5 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 39.6 28% 38.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2133 C14 Series 1x4GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.9% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.9 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82) Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82)

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	31x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	25x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	9x

SSD
SSDSCKKW240H6 240GBIntelBench 76%, 3,142 samples	7x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	5x
BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD2 2x4GBCrucialBench 77%, 1,881 samples	4x
CT4G4DFS8213.M8FB 2x4GBCrucialBench 68%, 473 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 123% - Outstanding

Total price: $165

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16