Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4 PRO-3340B HD Graphics 126 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Memory 37.2 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 63.3 25% 41.7 Pts	4-Core 85 8-Core 87.8 12% 86.4 Pts	64-Core 83.4 5% 83.4 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8240 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 8072) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 1.9 1% 2.03 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB 31,107 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 317GB free (System drive) Firmware: XA003R17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 288 305 289 292 320 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 310 Write 315 Mixed 298 SusWrite 297 69% 305 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 17.9 58% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 95.4 DQ Mixed 102 77% 104 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB 51,191 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5.2 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 216 18% 216 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 15%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
A4 PRO-3340B HD GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 126 samples	9x

GPU
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,521 samples	8x
Radeon HD 8200 / R3 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v2.0)AMDBench 1%, 3 samples	1x

RAM
Available Available 1x2GBNotBench 11%, 60 samples	5x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 9,805 samples	1x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16