Asus P8H77-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V LE  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '22 at 18:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 323
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.4% Average
Lighting 57.8
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 75.8
47% 64.6 fps
MRender 60.6
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 44.8
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 185 185 196 196 196 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 347
Write 191
Mixed 211
SusWrite 190
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 29.7
99% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 45.6
42% 63.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
283GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 107 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 114
Write 93
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 108
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-011.A01LF 99U5471-011.A01LF 8001 R538G1601U2S 9905403-559.A00LF 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V LE Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V LE - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback