HP EliteBook 835 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 835 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8760
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '22 at 16:59
Run Duration77 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 135
2-Core 269
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 782
81% 651 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8760) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.16.03
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 19.5
12% 16.1 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 16
Splatting 16.7
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA256TDV-1AY1AABHA 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0032
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,976
Write 3,665
Mixed 4,170
949% 4,270 MB/s
4K Read 481
4K Write 407
4K Mixed 431
1,497% 440 MB/s
DQ Read 1122
DQ Write 833
DQ Mixed 891
690% 949 MB/s
Poor: 121% Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 12.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 12.2
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 835 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 835 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback