HP ProBook 640 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 640 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2101
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '22 at 12:44
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 125
50% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 181
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08979
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 109 109 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 376
Write 244
Mixed 144
SusWrite 107
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 21.8
59% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 94
DQ Mixed 105
79% 105 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2013)-$55
269GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 104 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 82.7
Write 85.7
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 103
62% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 640 G1 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 640 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback