Asus Vivo AIO 27 V272UN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemAsus Vivo AIO 27 V272UN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V272UN
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200430
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 20 '22 at 10:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
BGA1356, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 471
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0
Asus(1043 17BE) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 16.9
15% 17.3 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 15.5
13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 109 39 93 32 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 458
Write 386
Mixed 343
SusWrite 68.6
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 1.3
58% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 18.9
44% 100 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 79%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
871GB free
Firmware: JU0C1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 131 132 131 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 140
Mixed 56
SusWrite 132
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.7
256% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivo AIO 27 V272UN Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivo AIO 27 V272UN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback