TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8392
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '22 at 21:56
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 163
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 316
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 66.2%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8392) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2686
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 29
Parallax 30.6
24% 29.9 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 19.4
22% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 23.8%
 Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7001T 1TB
701GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 318 350 369 276 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 423
Write 339
Mixed 314
SusWrite 275
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 19.9
81% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 47.5
87% 167 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 68.4%
 Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 19.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 69.1%
 Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples1,255x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples196x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples324x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples302x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples265x
SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples166x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples75x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba  $50Bench 125%, 44,050 samples67x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples145x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples77x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples66x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback