Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory48 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '22 at 15:43
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 965
91% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,469
91% 1,469 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.3% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 77.7
46% 64.6 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 44.5
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP500GM30013 500GB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1729 740 470 459 481 485 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,775
Write 3,319
Mixed 2,651
SusWrite 727
532% 2,368 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 104
336% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,210
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 960
722% 978 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 304%
Great: 411%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 42B2S7JA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 235 239 234 239 235 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,549
Write 1,223
Mixed 1,236
SusWrite 265
290% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 84.6
294% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 809
DQ Write 882
DQ Mixed 488
466% 726 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 247%
Great: 277%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1366 1356 1369 1360 1367 725 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,688
Write 1,375
Mixed 1,184
SusWrite 1257
309% 1,376 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 86.1
284% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 754
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 346
376% 627 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 267%
Great: 277%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 200 204 198 203 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 136
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 201
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 116%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
3TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 189 192 186 193 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 157
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 190
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GVK Adata DDR4 3200 F4-3200C16-16GVK Adata DDR4 3200 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 35.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 37.2
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $937
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback