Acer TravelMate 7740G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate 7740G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA70-CP
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '22 at 10:41
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 87.2
1-Core 41.6
2-Core 85.7
48% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 194
22% 172 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Acer(1025 0412) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 4.2
4% 4.97 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256-G2 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 160 85 83 85 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 230
Write 177
Mixed 204
SusWrite 115
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 18.6
62% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 140
107% 144 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B8HC0NS-BE 80CE M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
533, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.8% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate 7740G Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate 7740G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback