Fujitsu ESPRIMO G5011

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO G5011  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3904-A1
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '22 at 08:58
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400T
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 9.47
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 199
48% 102 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 506
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 673
42% 673 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1259) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 5.8
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 5
Splatting 8.4
5% 5.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jmicron Tech 250GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 259 263 261 185 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.7% Above average
Read 242
Write 191
Mixed 211
SusWrite 234
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 21.3
68% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 113
88% 119 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 83%
Samsung MZVL2256HCHQ-00B07 256GB
172GB free
Firmware: GXA7402Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 876 963 1264 902 425 416 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 722
Write 550
Mixed 576
SusWrite 808
150% 664 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 35.4
108% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 430
338% 459 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 133%
Great: 359%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 4.1
14% 4.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 1.5
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 409
10% 409 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO G5011 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO G5011

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback