Gigabyte H370M D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H370M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte H370M D3H  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '22 at 04:19
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 513
60% 463 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX590 GME
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 62.4
Parallax 93.4
56% 74.9 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 46.9
50% 63.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 480GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RS70V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 111 7.1 150 14 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 388
Write 334
Mixed 309
SusWrite 106
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 18.9
78% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 43.6
80% 155 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
398GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 154 154 152 156 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 179
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 152
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 44 50 45 47 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 15.2
Write 39.4
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 47.7
23% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
386GB free
Firmware: AM0P6M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 105 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 69.2
Write 87.1
Mixed 32
SusWrite 106
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX432C16FB3/8 KF432C16BB/8-SP 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 20.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 16
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370M D3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $484
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback