Pcware APMCP61-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPcware APMCP61-D3  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE APMCP61-D3
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '22 at 04:10
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 91.6
47% 72 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 151
19% 147 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 36.3
28% 36.1 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 25.6
26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Husky SS D 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V071
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 127 58 119 29 5.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
Read 227
Write 176
Mixed 189
SusWrite 78.9
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 12
59% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 20.1
24% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 39%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
298GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 112 113 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 103
Write 110
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 111
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
201% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
298GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 63.3
Write 70.6
Mixed 42.9
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
190GB free
Firmware: 0002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 61
Write 73.7
Mixed 35.6
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 43%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
25GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.9
Write 7.5
Mixed 8.9
14% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.6
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical APMCP61-D3 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Pcware APMCP61-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback