Pegatron IPMH61P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemPegatron IPMH61P1  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMH61P1
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3250
SOCKET 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 86.8
1-Core 61.6
2-Core 124
57% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 208
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 39.2
31% 40.9 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 28.5
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Sc10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 69 103 62 44 8.7 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 218
Write 134
Mixed 144
SusWrite 57.6
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 15
65% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 38.1
DQ Mixed 22.4
19% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
54GB free
Firmware: PA11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 6.8 6.3 7.4 9.1 7.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
100GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 56
Write 25
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 18.5
35% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
35% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 30%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
719GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 19 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 55.6
Write 24.1
Mixed 22
SusWrite 17.7
35% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH61P1 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron IPMH61P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback