Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme6/3.1  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 15:48
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 246
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 753
76% 616 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0519) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.8% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 95.5
51% 74.4 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 48.6
50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 127 77 59 97 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 426
Write 322
Mixed 324
SusWrite 115
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 31.5
128% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 186
167% 250 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905678-012.A00G 99U5702-094.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 20.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme6/3.1 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback