Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 13:50
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 296
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 807
84% 675 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.4% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 60
47% 58.2 fps
MRender 57.5
Gravity 60
Splatting 42.4
42% 53.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SN350 1TB
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33004000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1065 1558 1497 125 87 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,724
Write 1,437
Mixed 1,571
SusWrite 742
307% 1,369 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 72.3
242% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,229
DQ Write 920
DQ Mixed 1,018
776% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 237%
Great: 350%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
54GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 107 109 107 106 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 368
Write 147
Mixed 178
SusWrite 107
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 29.3
102% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 115
91% 125 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
350GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 141 141 142 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 167
Write 77.6
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 141
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 112%
USB3.0 Super Speed 500GB
408GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 37 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 32.4
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 36.6
47% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
57% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 24.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 23.7
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $620
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback