Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3400M APU 3,654 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 42.2 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 42.9 24% 35.8 Pts	4-Core 64.3 8-Core 70 9% 67.2 Pts	64-Core 65.9 4% 65.9 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G 8,067 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0600) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.7.0 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	2.38% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.97 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.5 3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.38% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 162 163 167 181 192 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.1% Average	Read 182 Write 147 Mixed 156 SusWrite 169 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 16.6 59% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 66.4 DQ Mixed 53.7 50% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG Kingston 99U5428-042.A00G 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
SATA SSD 240GBKioxia-exceriaBench 71%, 6,527 samples	2x
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	1x
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	5x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	4x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 6GBUnknownBench 24%, 137 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16