Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 15:40
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 59
2-Core 110
50% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 157
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 1.7
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 120GB SSD 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 309 275 153 132 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 405
Write 309
Mixed 252
SusWrite 208
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 11.8
60% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 23.5
22% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
426GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 135 138 136 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
78% Very good
Read 136
Write 143
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 136
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 13.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback