Gigabyte GA-B450M DS3H WIFI V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H WIFI V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M DS3H WIFI V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200907
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 06:22
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 263
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 792
77% 631 Pts
64-Core 986
61% 986 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Asus(1043 86CC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68% Good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 84.6
Parallax 74.1
74% 83 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 69
57% 69.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 500GB SSD 500GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.11.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,857
Write 1,368
Mixed 936
306% 1,387 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 41.3
199% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 607
DQ Mixed 63.2
191% 409 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 246%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 32.9
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 30.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M DS3H WIFI V2-CF Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M DS3H WIFI V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $839
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback