Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory13GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 13 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 00:31
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 117
54% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 244
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 35.8
21% 29.6 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 20
20% 25.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 164 50 51 47 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 312
Write 293
Mixed 239
SusWrite 113
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 29.8
95% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 123
100% 142 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS543212L9SA02 120GB
4GB free
Firmware: FBBAC52F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 25.6
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 27.3
22% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B2873FHS- BLS8G3D18ADS3 F3-1600C11-4G 13GB
667, 933, 800 MHz
1024, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.2% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback