Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R670-2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory43.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 23:31
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 167
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 591
55% 458 Pts
64-Core 1,208
75% 1,208 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 63.4
53% 65.3 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 62.2
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 140 132 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 358
Write 189
Mixed 216
SusWrite 143
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 32.4
109% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 118
102% 151 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 108%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 600GB
477GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 179
Write 72.5
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 73.3
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x8GB
6 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 20.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback