PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Zoostorm 7200-5325A (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK H110M-R |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170209 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Dec 16 '22 at 09:45 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
|
88.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N1 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 163 162 159 162 MB/s
|
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 60 73 74 82 78 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
1TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 41 41 42 MB/s
|
23.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 CT8G4DFD824A.M16FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
82.3%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 3x |
Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 1x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $456 |