HP ProBook 4530s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemHP ProBook 4530s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 167C
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 18:09
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 44.5
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 103
42% 72 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 154
18% 143 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 167D) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 2,819
Mixed 49.7
298% 1,434 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 11.8
63% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 14.9
11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Fujitsu MHZ2160BJ G2 160GB
63GB free
Firmware: 891A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 51 51 50 50 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 53.8
Write 42.7
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 50.1
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 4530s Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 4530s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback