Toshiba SATELLITE S70-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE S70-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime103.4 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 14:59
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 37.5
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 120
42% 75.2 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 52.7
20% 124 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA89) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 2.1
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.4
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 172 167 178 143 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 194
Write 138
Mixed 149
SusWrite 176
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 12
30% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 62.6
DQ Mixed 93.4
78% 117 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE S70-A Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE S70-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback