Gigabyte GA-Q77M-D2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Q77M-D2H  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121220
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 08:58
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 186
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 461
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 128
Parallax 111
96% 119 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 100
Splatting 95.2
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 92 53 59 61 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 350
Write 149
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 59.5
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 7.1
55% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 90
DQ Mixed 0.1
16% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 86%
SSD 1TB 1TB
238GB free
Firmware: FW200810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 5 34 31 2.8 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 407
Write 191
Mixed 6
SusWrite 19.6
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2
55% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 209%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
264GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 149 167 167 169 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 157
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 160
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
227GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 126 133 133 134 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 113
Write 121
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 128
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter9.A01LF Kingston 9905403-001.B00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Q77M-D2H Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q77M-D2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback