Lenovo 10AGS03501

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10AGS03501  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 08:31
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 177
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 238
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 309F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4326
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 3.8
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD0256S00 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 64 128 27 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 419
Write 310
Mixed 336
SusWrite 105
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 20.9
89% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 38.4
87% 175 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
466GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 125 124 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 118
Write 126
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 121
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 4.2
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AGS03501 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AGS03501

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback