Asus P6T DELUXE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics85.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6T DELUXE V2  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 04:51
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 124
60% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 309
34% 268 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.8% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 121
Parallax 119
91% 117 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 96.3
Splatting 89.9
76% 93.4 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 163 217 242 204 148 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61% Good
Read 260
Write 248
Mixed 234
SusWrite 180
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 31.2
104% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 154
116% 156 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST3320620A 320GB
174GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 54 56 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 37.4
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 54.8
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 13.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T DELUXE V2 Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T DELUXE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback