Lenovo 34486Z5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 34486Z5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 34486Z5
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 17:17
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3667U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 115
49% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 162
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F9) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD5SG2256G1052E 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.04.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 331 346 342 345 250 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 392
Write 380
Mixed 163
SusWrite 323
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 26.8
95% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 134
124% 194 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 34486Z5 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 34486Z5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback