Fujitsu ESPRIMO G5011

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO G5011  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3904-A1
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 15:48
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i7-11700T
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 196
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 520
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1259) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 8
5% 8.5 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 7
6% 8.03 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B07 512GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7602Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1663 1699 1704 1741 1727 1767 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,696
Write 1,871
Mixed 1,643
SusWrite 1,717
391% 1,732 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 61.4
197% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 653
505% 682 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 265%
Great: 423%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-110.A00G 9905700-122.A00G 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 30.1
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 21.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO G5011 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO G5011

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback