Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

18 months ago, 17 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300U 24,421 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 32.4 1-Core 78.5 2-Core 133 44% 81.3 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 213 26% 202 Pts	64-Core 213 13% 213 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 2070) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	5.59% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 6.6 5% 5.33 fps	MRender 6.8 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 11.9 7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.59% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 262 284 291 295 285 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	56% Above average	Read 354 Write 322 Mixed 330 SusWrite 281 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 21.2 4K Mixed 16.9 56% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 146 113% 158 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905711-002.A00G 2x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.8% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 10.4 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 241 17% 241 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-7300UIntelBench 45%, 24,421 samples	1x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1x

SSD
860 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 100%, 26,055 samples	1x

RAM
9905711-002.A00G 2x4GBKingstonBench 71%, 13 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16